Search results

I actually don't mind the grey eyelets despite that not being OG...White inevitably turns yellow and looks like crap.

Mine have very mild creasing like your right shoe on the pair on the right. Fortunately, to me it looks like a flux capacitor shape, and thus is well in line with the 90s ;-). Overall, LOVING this release. Not AMIII 90s cushy, but I find them comfy (for what they are), and they look awesome.

Great callouts; that all makes sense. After getting these I couldn't look at any other 90s with any desire to purchase. Bacons toe box was just awful as well; a shame.

Toe shape and mudguard shape of GRs don't look anything like the AMIII in my opinion.

Seriously. Pretty much what they did with the AM IIIs. Arguably that's even more nuts b/c they continuously pump out 90s but use the other pathetic molds instead of the amazing version they spent so much time getting right. I still don't understand it. Put that sucker on every/any colorway!

This is exactly the type of context that Nike should freely share when things look diff from OGs.

"Keeping DS" has become synonymous with "rot away in a closet until they either fall apart or you decide to sell". They're not investments; putting the double up money in any index fund will make far more money.

Seeing these pics make me appreciate my '16s. Recently posted mine on ebay when I heard about this release. Gonna pull it for now. Without a dramatically better shape and less bulky build, I'm good.

So glad I wan't into these prior releases....that bubble is unaccessible. Even worse than the 95s bubble shrinkage.

If I'm not mistaken, those pics are of the '16s mocked up with the expected '24 tweaks.

Thank you. These are probably worn, but the shape on the '24s look a bit unnatural compared to these. Maybe thery overstuffed the toe boxes. If the materials are super nice, though, these will do well. I don't like the toe box shape and materials on my '19s, but they do look damn good on...

Can't find a good pick of the OGs; anyone? Shape looks nice. Curious about the materials. Midsole yellowing looks blah. Lava print looks strange.

And the angle of the mesh used to be a sign of fakes, but then Nike adopted the off angle (vertical) fake design, and now they're back again to OG. Makes no sense. Peaks are an OG feature so at least that makes sense.

My wife ran Boston and the number of runners with Nike alphaflys was honestly quite astounding. That shoe truly dominated, including top runners. Yes, there were other brands, but these were freak'n everywhere.

They said they used the AM1 BB air unit in these. Clearly they were using the AM1 units as of late on the last 180 retros. Wonder what they'll be using in the 95s as that's a completely diff setup. Actually new units from the ground up?

For me this is a one and one. LOVE the ultramarine colorway; not only is it an OG classic, but I actually prefer it to the other OG colorways (even if Jordan wore the concords). These, the BBs Reds, and the 90 infrareds will last me a lifetime of summers in the rotation. Heck the 90s still look...

Un-DS'd these today. Definitely fit the same as BBs, which I'd say are TTS. Happy I went half size up on these just for a little extra room, which I seem to be preferring these days. Can't go wrong either way in my opinion; just depends on your personal taste. These look and feel awesome. Not...

I'm lucky b/c none of my 4s hurt me. Certainly not comfortable per se, but I can wear them all day long and not have actual physical pain. Even '15 Oreos, which are bricks don't hurt. I do have to say though that the SBs are on a completely diff level. Just putting them on I can feel the diff...

Might have to hit up a restock if mine goes missing. UPS is very late now and the final boss may have won. Probably should have gone for a pair this morning as insurance. Hate having to play that game, but seems necessary these days to guarantee one shows up. SMH EDIT: Literally just showed up...

Roger that. I'll consider myself schooled. Thanks...and thank you for the link the other day!