Search results

Check that left shoe on these originals

All you talking about the toe creasing, they are made exactly like the original , the material is thin like the 1991 pair , which was thin for the running purpose and was subject to creasing. If you look at pics of the originals you will see the toe creasing and not perfect, like the Nike...

ALL CANADIAN BOUTIQUES GOT EM! GO HUNTING PEEPS!

https://www.instagram.com/stories/forsy23/3374437297589327644?utm_source=ig_story_item_share&igsh=MXhmbm00aW03cDJtZw== Not sure if this will work , but maybe you can see it

I have a video of these in motion see if I can post somehow.

yes it is weak, but that is how it is supposed to be, exactly like the original. light weight and a thin material on the toe box.

I’ve done a few videos on the 180 as I love this shoe, Enjoy and let me know what you think. Some are old so not the best editing on a few of them .

by the way , they are way more comfortable than any previous retro.

hey thanks for sharing my video

Narrow footer , but I feel these fit big . I wouldn’t go a size up.

STAY tts

https://thesolesupplier.co.uk/release-dates/nike/air-max-180/nike-air-max-180-og-ultramarine/

https://size.ca/blogs/release-calendar

Video is live!!! Let me know what you all think .

Video will be up on the YouTube channel. I think these are good, and I will explain in th video.

The air bubble sits inside the casing. the outer window (hard) is part of the sole.

i think they are talking about the window in front of the air bubble, original detail on the 180, it is part of the actual sole , i believe it is a pronation detail as well as it acts like a cup holding the air bag in side. i will try ti find the picture. I will have mine today and review...