***Official Political Discussion Thread***

People have known about this relationship for many years, they're just now acting like it's a big deal because he went against their cause (he's pro israel) :smh:
Woody Allen right now:

1715704779754.gif
 
People have known about this relationship for many years, they're just now acting like it's a big deal because he went against their cause (he's pro israel) :smh:



Or maybe it’s because a notoriously vanilla comedian oddly out of the blue decided to complain about cancel culture for some reason

Unless he feels bad for Michael Richards
 
McDonald's is wildin and i'm sure they're feeling the pressure too. Saw an ad for the hash brown that basically said " yeah you can make it at home, that little bs don't taste like ours though"
 
McDonalds charging sit down restaurant prices but RustyShackleford RustyShackleford going to say inflation isn't sticky.

When his apples start getting hit then he will care, all fun and games when it's just my mimosas suffering :smh:

McDonald’s should be expensive considering how food like that has been a large contributor to the health crisis. Unhealthy foods should be charged a surtax.
 

The most rightwing appeals court in the country has heard a case over discriminatory electoral maps in Galveston, Texas, which threatens to puncture a fresh hole in the already battered 1965 Voting Rights Act.

The US court of appeals for the fifth circuit, which has six of 17 active judges appointed by Donald Trump, heard a clash of views over whether Black and Latino minority voters could have their combined electoral voice protected.

The case, Petteway v Galveston County, risks removing the right of minority groups to join forces in so-called “coalition districts” to elect representatives of their choice.

In October, a federal district judge threw out new electoral maps drawn up by the Republican-controlled county, which eviscerated the only district out of four in which African American and Latino voters collectively were in the majority.

Judge Jeffrey Brown ruled that the eradication of the majority-minority district was a “stark and jarring” violation of the Voting Rights Act, describing the revised maps as “mean-spirited” and “egregious”.

Addressing the full bench of the fifth circuit, Chad Dunn, the lawyer representing the Black and Latino voters who would in effect be disenfranchised by the new maps, gave an impassioned plea for their right to be heard. “Is it too much to ask for one seat at the table?” he asked.
 
Back
Top Bottom