6 Rings G.O.A.T.
Supporter
- 133,940
- 112,690
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2006
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Weed legal in Minnesota before sports gambling
not touching with the bike doesn't excuse the idiot bmx dude to be doing some crazy stunts in a public place where people are waiting for public transport and him letting his bike go like that is asking for some trouble. also he could have backed off but him retaliating makes him more of a criminal. I remember years ago when I was crossing the street with my son on a stroller when this idiot driver just ran like there's no tomorrow on a red light. we nearly got hit but that didn't seem to make it okay for me and my son. I would have beaten the crap out of that driver if he was stuck in traffic. the dude with the kid got mad because he was oblige to protect his family.
Reminded me of those cool 80’s phones made in clear cases. The fancy ones had neon lights insideHeineken x Bodega Flip Phone
I understand your reason although that doesn't warrant putting others in danger due to own recklessness.Nah, you gotta be alert in public.
As someone who grew up skating and still snowboards I’m taking bmx dudes side.
I understand your reason although that doesn't warrant putting others in danger due to own recklessness.
Falling on bikes is different than letting your bike ran amock in public.People fall on bikes all the time in crowded areas. Would you have the same energy to a dude on a road bike hauling *** losing control?
I mean I thought he just bailed. I didn't think he did it on purpose. Did you think he did it on purpose?Falling on bikes is different that letting your bike ran amock in public.
Nah, you gotta be alert in public.
As someone who grew up skating and still snowboards I’m taking bmx dudes side.
**** happens, he didn't hit anyone. if his bike went blasting into him then sure.
it's called being responsible for your actions. you are justifying his stunts regardless of the consequences. you don't wait for something to happen badly nor say it's ok because nobody got hurt. that's how fatalities happen. idiots pushing the boundaries of sensibility.I mean I thought he just bailed. I didn't think he did it on purpose. Did you think he did it on purpose?
I'm not justifying *censored*.it's called being responsible for your actions. you are justifying his stunts regardless of the consequences. you don't wait for something to happen badly nor say it's ok because nobody got hurt. that's how fatalities happen. idiots pushing the boundaries of sensibility.
regardless whether he did it on purpose or not, just look at the lack of disregard for other people. he was more concerned on getting his bike rather than apologizing or checking on people who could have gotten hurt.I'm not justifying *censored*.
I just asked a simple question: Do you think he did it in purpose?
If you're selling that he was reckless, I can buy that.
To that end I agree.regardless whether he did it on purpose or not, just look at the lack of disregard for other people. he was more concerned on getting his bike rather than apologizing or checking on people who could have gotten hurt.
on the otherhand, it does seem to push the boundaries of recklessness and doing it on purpose. when you don't think of other people around you, it can be perceived as doing it on purpose.
e.g. it wasn't my intention to hit you but your face is in the way of my fist. I know it seems comedic but you get the point.